
Mutator Reference and Choosing the Right Mutators
mutators.RmdA mutator defines one kind of code change. When you pass a mutator to
muttest_plan(), muttest finds every matching pattern in
your source file and produces one mutant per match.
Operator mutators
operator() — custom pair
The most flexible mutator. Replaces any token with any other token.
Use this when you need a specific swap not covered by the preset functions.
arithmetic_operators() — preset for arithmetic
Returns a ready-made list of operator mutators covering common arithmetic mistakes:
| Original | Mutant |
|---|---|
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
* |
/ |
/ |
* |
^ |
* |
%% |
* |
%/% |
/ |
💡 When to use: Any function that performs calculations — finance, statistics, data transformations. Arithmetic operator swaps can happen easily and go unnoticed.
plan <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/finance.R",
mutators = arithmetic_operators()
)Example: Mean Absolute Deviation — Direction-Insensitive Assertion
An assertion that checks a property of the result (sign, order, non-negativity) rather than the value will be blind to arithmetic operator swaps. Both the original and the mutant satisfy the same directional constraint, so the mutant survives. Replacing the directional assertion with an exact-value assertion kills it.
The function
mean_absolute_deviation computes the average distance
from a center point: mean(abs(x - center)). The subtraction
x - center is the step that arithmetic operator mutators
target.
Weak test
test_that("mean absolute deviation is non-negative", {
expect_gte(mean_absolute_deviation(c(1, 3, 5), 3), 0)
})The test asserts that the result is non-negative
(expect_gte(..., 0)). This checks a property of the output
rather than its value.
Mutation testing output:
ℹ Mutation Testing
| K | S | E | T | % | Mutator | File
x | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | - → + | mad.R
── Results ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ KILLED 0 | SURVIVED 1 | ERRORS 0 | TOTAL 1 | SCORE 0.0% ]
- → + survives. Changing x - center to
x + center gives a different number, but
abs(x + center) is also non-negative for all inputs. For
x = c(1,3,5) and center = 3:
- Original:
abs(c(-2, 0, 2))→ mean = 4/3 ≈ 1.33 - Mutant:
abs(c(4, 6, 8))→ mean = 6
Both are ≥ 0. The assertion cannot distinguish them.
This pattern is common in LLM-generated tests that check what is obviously true about the result (it is positive, it is numeric) rather than what is specifically correct.
The fix
test_that("mean absolute deviation equals average distance from center", {
expect_equal(mean_absolute_deviation(c(1, 3, 5), 3), 4 / 3)
})Replace the directional assertion with expect_equal and
a value computed by hand. Now the mutant returns 6, which is not 4/3,
and the test fails.
After the fix:
ℹ Mutation Testing
| K | S | E | T | % | Mutator | File
✔ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | - → + | mad.R
── Results ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ KILLED 1 | SURVIVED 0 | ERRORS 0 | TOTAL 1 | SCORE 100.0% ]
When an arithmetic mutant survives, replace directional assertions (
expect_gt,expect_gte) with exact-value assertions (expect_equal). Compute the expected value by hand and hard-code it.
comparison_operators() — preset for comparisons
Covers boundary and direction mistakes in comparison expressions:
| Original | Mutant |
|---|---|
< |
> |
> |
< |
<= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
== |
!= |
!= |
== |
< |
<= |
> |
>= |
💡 When to use: Functions with threshold logic, range checks, or filter conditions. Off-by-one and direction errors are easy to introduce and hard to catch with weak tests.
Example: Shipping Cost — Missing Boundary Value
A test suite that checks only “clearly above” and “clearly below” cases will let a boundary-shift mutant survive. The surviving mutant names the exact input your tests have never exercised. Adding a test at that precise boundary value kills it.
The function
shipping_cost <- function(weight_kg) {
if (weight_kg > 5) 15.00 else 5.00
}shipping_cost returns a flat rate based on whether the
package is over or under 5 kg. The strict > operator
means a 5 kg package pays the lower rate; >= would
charge it the higher rate.
Weak test
test_that("heavy packages cost more than light ones", {
expect_gt(shipping_cost(10), shipping_cost(2))
})The test confirms that a heavy package costs more than a light one. It passes inputs of 10 and 2 kg — both clearly on opposite sides of the boundary — so it never exercises the value 5 itself.
Mutation testing output:
ℹ Mutation Testing
| K | S | E | T | % | Mutator | File
✔ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | > → < | shipping.R
x | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 50 | > → >= | shipping.R
── Results ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ KILLED 1 | SURVIVED 1 | ERRORS 0 | TOTAL 2 | SCORE 50.0% ]
> → >= survives. Changing
weight_kg > 5 to weight_kg >= 5 only
affects input weight_kg = 5 exactly. For inputs 10 and 2,
the function returns identical results under both operators, so the test
cannot tell the operators apart.
In production, >= 5 instead of > 5
would route 5 kg shipments to the expensive tier and no test would catch
the regression.
The fix
test_that("heavy packages cost more than light ones", {
expect_gt(shipping_cost(10), shipping_cost(2))
})
test_that("5kg falls into the lower-cost tier", {
expect_equal(shipping_cost(5), 5.00)
})Add a test that passes the exact boundary value 5. With
> 5, the condition is FALSE and the
function returns 5.00. With >= 5, it is
TRUE and returns 15.00. This difference kills
the mutant.
After the fix:
ℹ Mutation Testing
| K | S | E | T | % | Mutator | File
✔ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | > → < | shipping.R
✔ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 | > → >= | shipping.R
── Results ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ KILLED 2 | SURVIVED 0 | ERRORS 0 | TOTAL 2 | SCORE 100.0% ]
When a comparison mutant survives, find the boundary value implied by the operator and add a test that passes exactly that value.
logical_operators() — preset for logical operators
| Original | Mutant |
|---|---|
&& |
\|\| |
\|\| |
&& |
& |
\| |
\| |
& |
💡 When to use: Functions with compound conditions
(if (a && b)). Swapping && for
|| is a classic logic bug that coverage cannot detect.
Example: Access Control — Symmetric Inputs Hide || vs
&&
When test inputs are symmetric — both arguments true, or both
arguments false — || and && produce
identical results. A test suite built entirely from symmetric inputs
cannot distinguish the two operators, so || → &&
survives. Adding a test with one argument true and the other false
reveals the difference and kills the mutant.
The function
can_access <- function(is_admin, is_owner) {
is_admin || is_owner
}can_access grants access when either
is_admin or is_owner is true, using
||. Swapping to && would require
both flags to be true — a fundamentally different access
policy.
Weak test
test_that("access control works", {
expect_true(can_access(TRUE, TRUE))
expect_false(can_access(FALSE, FALSE))
})The tests cover only two cases: both TRUE (should allow
access) and both FALSE (should deny access). These are the
“happy path” and the “all-invalid” case — typical of tests written for
simple scenarios without thinking about individual flag variation.
Mutation testing output:
ℹ Mutation Testing
| K | S | E | T | % | Mutator | File
x | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | || → && | access.R
── Results ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ KILLED 0 | SURVIVED 1 | ERRORS 0 | TOTAL 1 | SCORE 0.0% ]
|| → && survives for both test cases:
-
can_access(TRUE, TRUE):TRUE && TRUE = TRUE— still passesexpect_true -
can_access(FALSE, FALSE):FALSE && FALSE = FALSE— still passesexpect_false
The logical distinction between || and
&& only appears when the operands
disagree. No test ever passes (FALSE, TRUE) or
(TRUE, FALSE), so the function behaves identically for both
operators across the entire test suite.
The fix
test_that("access control works", {
expect_true(can_access(TRUE, TRUE))
expect_false(can_access(FALSE, FALSE))
})
test_that("owner-only access is granted", {
expect_true(can_access(FALSE, TRUE))
})
test_that("admin-only access is granted", {
expect_true(can_access(TRUE, FALSE))
})Add tests with asymmetric inputs — one flag true and the other false.
can_access(FALSE, TRUE) returns TRUE with
|| but FALSE with &&.
This difference kills the mutant.
After the fix:
ℹ Mutation Testing
| K | S | E | T | % | Mutator | File
✔ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | || → && | access.R
── Results ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
[ KILLED 1 | SURVIVED 0 | ERRORS 0 | TOTAL 1 | SCORE 100.0% ]
When a logical operator mutant survives, add tests with asymmetric inputs (one flag true, the other false). These inputs reveal the difference between
&&(requires both) and||(requires either).
Boolean literal mutators
boolean_literal() — flip TRUE/FALSE
boolean_literal("TRUE", "FALSE") # TRUE → FALSE
boolean_literal("FALSE", "TRUE") # FALSE → TRUE💡 When to use: Functions with hard-coded boolean
flags or default arguments like na.rm = TRUE,
stringsAsFactors = FALSE. Flipping the default reveals
whether tests exercise both states.
boolean_literals() — preset for boolean literals
Returns a ready-made list covering all canonical flips:
| Original | Mutant |
|---|---|
TRUE |
FALSE |
FALSE |
TRUE |
T |
F |
F |
T |
plan <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/flags.R",
mutators = boolean_literals()
)Numeric mutators
numeric_increment() — add 1 to every numeric
literal
numeric_increment() # 5 → 6, 0 → 1, 100 → 101
numeric_decrement() — subtract 1 from every numeric
literal
numeric_decrement() # 5 → 4, 1 → 0, 100 → 99💡 When to use: Functions where exact numeric constants matter — thresholds, window sizes, counts, index boundaries. Off-by-one errors in constants are common and often untested.
numeric_literals() — preset for numeric constants
Returns numeric_increment() and
numeric_decrement() together.
plan <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/thresholds.R",
mutators = numeric_literals()
)String mutators
string_empty() — replace strings with
""
string_empty() # "hello" → ""
string_fill() — replace empty strings with
"mutant"
string_fill() # "" → "mutant"💡 When to use: string_empty() is
useful for functions that return or compare string values — it checks
whether your tests would notice a blank output.
string_fill() tests whether your code handles non-empty
strings where empty ones are expected.
string_literals() — preset for string literals
Returns string_empty() and string_fill()
together.
plan <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/labels.R",
mutators = string_literals()
)Condition mutators
negate_condition() — wrap condition in
!(...)
negate_condition()
# if (x > 0) → if (!(x > 0))
# while (done) → while (!(done))
remove_condition_negation() — strip leading
!
remove_condition_negation()
# if (!done) → if (done)
# if (!valid) → if (valid)
remove_negation() — remove ! anywhere
remove_negation()
# !is.na(x) → is.na(x)
# !is.null(y) → is.null(y)💡 When to use: Functions with guard clauses and
early returns. These mutators reveal whether your tests cover both
branches of a condition. A surviving negate_condition()
mutant means the test inputs never trigger the FALSE
branch.
condition_mutations() — preset for condition logic
Returns negate_condition() and
remove_condition_negation() together.
plan <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/validation.R",
mutators = condition_mutations()
)Function call mutator
call_name() — swap one function name for another
call_name("any", "all") # any(x) → all(x)
call_name("min", "max") # min(x) → max(x)
call_name("sum", "prod") # sum(x) → prod(x)💡 When to use: Functions that delegate to summary
or aggregation helpers. any vs all and
min vs max are among the easiest mistakes to
make and the hardest to spot in a review.
NA and NULL mutators
na_literal() — swap NA/NULL values
na_literal("NA", "NULL") # NA → NULL
na_literal("NULL", "NA") # NULL → NA
na_literal("NA", "NA_real_") # NA → NA_real_
na_literal("NA_real_", "NA") # NA_real_ → NA💡 When to use: Functions that accept or return
NA or NULL, especially any code with
is.na(), is.null(), or na.rm
handling. Swapping NA for NULL (and vice
versa) reveals whether callers distinguish between “value is missing”
and “value is absent” — two distinct concepts that R treats very
differently.
Swapping between typed NAs (NA_real_,
NA_integer_, NA_character_) and plain
NA checks whether type-sensitive downstream code
(e.g. vapply, dplyr::mutate) is covered.
na_literals() — preset for NA and NULL
Returns mutators for all common NA/NULL swaps:
| Original | Mutant |
|---|---|
NA |
NULL |
NULL |
NA |
NA |
NA_real_ |
NA_real_ |
NA |
NA |
NA_integer_ |
NA_integer_ |
NA |
NA |
NA_character_ |
NA_character_ |
NA |
plan <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/missing.R",
mutators = na_literals()
)Return value mutators
replace_return_value() — replace explicit return
values
replace_return_value() # return(x) → return(NULL)
replace_return_value("NA") # return(x) → return(NA)💡 When to use: Any function with explicit
return() calls. Tests that only check that a function
runs without error or returns something will not kill
these mutants — only tests that assert the specific value returned
will.
A surviving replace_return_value() mutant means the
caller never checks what came back from that branch. This is especially
common in functions with multiple early-exit return() paths
where only the happy path is tested.
Only explicit return(expr) calls are targeted; implicit
returns (the last expression of a function body) are not affected.
Index and subscript mutators
index_increment() — shift subscript indices up by
one
index_increment() # x[i] → x[i + 1L], x[[i]] → x[[i + 1L]]
index_decrement() — shift subscript indices down by
one
index_decrement() # x[i] → x[i - 1L], x[[i]] → x[[i - 1L]]💡 When to use: Functions that index into vectors or lists by position or by a computed variable. Off-by-one errors in indexing are among the most common silent bugs in R — they produce a different element rather than an error, so they pass all tests unless a specific element value is asserted.
Only simple indices are mutated: plain identifiers
(x[i]) and numeric literals (x[1],
x[1L]). Complex expressions like x[a + b] or
x[seq_len(n)] are left untouched, keeping the mutant count
focused and the signal-to-noise ratio high.
Both single-bracket ([) and double-bracket
([[) indexing are covered.
index_mutations() — preset for subscript indices
Returns index_increment() and
index_decrement() together.
plan <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/selectors.R",
mutators = index_mutations()
)Recommended starting set
If you are unsure where to begin, start here:
p <- muttest_plan(
source_files = "R/my_file.R",
mutators = c(
arithmetic_operators(),
comparison_operators(),
logical_operators(),
condition_mutations(),
numeric_literals(),
list(remove_negation())
)
)Look at the survivors, then layer in boolean_literals(),
na_literals(), string_literals(), or
index_mutations() for the specific patterns in your
code.
The better you know your codebase, the more you can target mutators
to the patterns that are most likely to harbor bugs. For example, if
your code has a lot of if statements but no numeric
constants, condition mutators will be more effective than numeric
ones.
You’ll figure it out as you go.